Setting the Stage

So, it falls to me to fire the opening salvo. It seems that the world is changing before our very eyes. Most philosophers and members of the academy agree that the Western world (which may be defined for the purposes of this conversation as that which is encompassed by Bertrand Russel’s “History of Western Philosophy” :-) ) is in some stage of paradigm shift. It is probably appropriate to begin dialog by trying to grapple a bit with the whole notion of Postmodernity. A mere trifle intellectually. Of course, it is important to set a few ground rules first.

It is imperative that participants in this discussion try, at least to some extent, to keep their thoughts on point and rooted in some semblance of reality. Naturally, your reality may differ from mine…. Nevertheless, let’s try to keep things on an even footing.

Additionally, it is quite important to keep things “family friendly”. There are other spots for those who are drawn to the obscene to participate on the net. Have at it. But don’t leave it here.

Finally, try to keep the ad hominem stuff to a minimum. I appreciate sarcasm and intellectual dogfighting. But let’s remember that ideas are like balloons floating through the air. It’s our job to try to shoot the idea down…not its proponent. If the idea stays afloat, it must be given respect. Quid erat demonstrandum, until proven otherwise. Saying somebody has a big nose, therefore they can’t be trusted may be viewed as a suspect line of reasoning. This also pertains to differing presuppositional bases. Not to mention, baldness. Don’t make fun of bald people. They have feelings too.

Posted in About. 8 Comments »

8 Responses to “Setting the Stage”

  1. Kevin Says:

    Great opener, I especially like the balloons… my son loves balloons and tries to pop them. Maybe he’s gonna be a thinker like his dad… :)

    Oh and good point to emphasize that bald people have feelings, we want them to feel welcome here… we are an non-judgmental blog, hair or hairless does not matter to us. :)

  2. Denny Says:

    Hmmm…I am concerned about your son. It sounds like he has violent tendencies. It seems that he is inclined toward destruction…not deconstruction!

    As far as being a non-judgmental blog is concerned, it is probably important to point out that the the idea of being non-judgmental implies that others are judgmental, and that such an attitude has negative connotations. Were you intentionally trying to set a judgmental atmosphere with such an assertion?

  3. Phil Says:

    I’m not bald, but people say I’m judgmental. I’m ok with that. What do you consider “judgmental”?

  4. Kevin Says:

    I was saying that others are judgmental towards those that are bald… and that we did not want a person of that persuasion to spew their ill will towards bald people on this site… since that may be utterly offensive.

  5. Denny Duchene Says:

    I understand your intent. The issue as I see it is that your claim that others are judgmental toward bald people is itself a judgmental statement. With that said, can we truly claim to be a non-judgmental blog? :-)

    Regarding Phil’s question, I think we can safely use him as a standard by which judgmentalism may be measured. So, Phil, feel free to tout your political, religious, and intellectual views on any topic. Given that you are a self-affirmed judgmentalist, we can then utilize your statements as a subjective basis for an analysis of judgmentalism…

  6. Kevin Says:

    I was unclear in my original comment I suppose. My intent then is that we can be judgmental… just not AGAINST bald people, hence the use of the word non-judgmental. We can be judgmental in FAVOR of bald people all we want. Everyone else… well you’re on your own I guess… we only defend bald people. Sorry. :)

  7. Denny Duchene Says:

    That clarifies everything! Perhaps we could actually start a movement that fosters judging everyone EXCEPT bald people. I mean, babies are bald. So they’re good.

  8. ericscot Says:

    hi.


Leave a Reply